lymph node: is location

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.70
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.69
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.68
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.68
, spleen
Weight: 0.63
, tonsil
Weight: 0.63
, lymph
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is location 1.00
is locations 0.83
is located 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(spleen, is located)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is located)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(tonsil, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is located)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(spleen, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(spleen, is located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lymph node, is location)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is locations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lymph node, is locations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lymph node, is locations)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(lymph node, is locations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is location)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lymph node, is location)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tonsil, is located)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, is location) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(spleen, is located)