macau: is administrative region

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.56
, region
Weight: 0.52
, territory
Weight: 0.49
, city
Weight: 0.48
, hong kong
Weight: 0.46
Siblings city hall
Weight: 0.28
, quebec city
Weight: 0.27
, spot
Weight: 0.27
, cellar
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is administrative region 1.00
is special administrative region 0.97
is administrative 0.94
is special region 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hong kong, is special administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(macau, is administrative region)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is special administrative region)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is special administrative region)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(hong kong, is special administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(macau, is administrative region)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(macau, is administrative region)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(macau, is special administrative region)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(macau, is administrative)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(macau, is administrative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(macau, is administrative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(macau, is administrative)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(macau, is special administrative region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(macau, is special region)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(macau, is special region)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(macau, is special administrative region)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(macau, is special administrative region)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(macau, is special region)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(macau, is special region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(macau, is administrative region)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(macau, is administrative region)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hong kong, is special administrative region)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(macau, is administrative region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hong kong, is special administrative region)