magazine: be better than books

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents periodical
Weight: 0.68
, journal
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, newspaper
Weight: 0.64
Siblings newsweek
Weight: 0.69
, science fiction
Weight: 0.67
, esquire
Weight: 0.64
, playboy
Weight: 0.64
, empire
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than books 1.00
be better than newspapers 0.80
be better than internet 0.80
more interesting than bible 0.79
be called book 0.76
is worth reading 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(journal, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than books)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(newspaper, be better than internet)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than books)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(journal, be called book)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than books)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(journal, be called book)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(newspaper, be better than internet)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(journal, be better than books)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(journal, be better than books)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, be better than internet)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(journal, be called book)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(science fiction, is worth reading)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(journal, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(newspaper, be better than internet)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(journal, be called book)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(magazine, be better than books)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(science fiction, is worth reading)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(science fiction, is worth reading)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(magazine, be better than books)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than newspapers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(magazine, more interesting than bible)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(magazine, more interesting than bible)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(magazine, be better than newspapers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(magazine, more interesting than bible)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(magazine, more interesting than bible)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(magazine, be better than newspapers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than newspapers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(magazine, be better than books)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(journal, be better than books)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(newspaper, be better than internet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(journal, be called book)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(science fiction, is worth reading)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(journal, be better than books)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(newspaper, be better than internet)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(magazine, be better than books)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(journal, be called book)