magazine: fail in digital age

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents periodical
Weight: 0.68
, journal
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, newspaper
Weight: 0.64
Siblings newsweek
Weight: 0.69
, science fiction
Weight: 0.67
, esquire
Weight: 0.64
, playboy
Weight: 0.64
, empire
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in digital age 1.00
fail in age 0.89
go digital 0.87
age of is 3 online 0.81
fail 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(empire, age of is 3 online)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(empire, age of is 3 online) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(empire, age of is 3 online)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(magazine, fail in digital age)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(magazine, fail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(magazine, fail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(magazine, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(magazine, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(magazine, fail in digital age)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(magazine, fail in digital age)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(magazine, fail in digital age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(empire, age of is 3 online)