maggot: rotting food in airtight container

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bait
Weight: 0.54
, animal
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.49
, creature
Weight: 0.48
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.33
, mackerel
Weight: 0.33
, squid
Weight: 0.32
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.32
, roach
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
rotting food in airtight container 1.00
be found on rotting meat 0.84
be found in decaying food 0.78
be found on rotten meat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maggot, be found on rotting meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(maggot, be found in decaying food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(maggot, be found on rotting meat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maggot, be found on rotting meat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(maggot, be found on rotten meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(maggot, be found in decaying food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(maggot, be found in decaying food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(maggot, be found on rotten meat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(maggot, be found on rotting meat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(maggot, be found on rotten meat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(maggot, be found on rotten meat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(maggot, be found in decaying food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(maggot, rotting food in airtight container)