magma: be with high levels of silica explosive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.56
, liquid
Weight: 0.54
, publication
Weight: 0.44
, influence
Weight: 0.43
, material
Weight: 0.42
Siblings liquid water
Weight: 0.34
, water vapor
Weight: 0.33
, liquid nitrogen
Weight: 0.33
, amniotic fluid
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with high levels of silica explosive 1.00
be with levels of silica explosive 0.99
be with high silica content dangerous 0.92
be with high silica content 0.90
be with silica content dangerous 0.89
be with silica likely 0.89
be with less silica likely 0.88
be with silica less likely 0.88
be with silica content 0.87
be with less silica less likely 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(magma, be with silica content)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(magma, be with high silica content)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(magma, be with silica content)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(magma, be with high silica content dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(magma, be with high silica content dangerous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(magma, be with high silica content dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(magma, be with silica content)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(magma, be with high silica content)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(magma, be with high silica content dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(magma, be with less silica less likely)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(magma, be with high silica content)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(magma, be with less silica less likely)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(magma, be with less silica less likely)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(magma, be with less silica less likely)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(magma, be with high silica content)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(magma, be with silica content)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(magma, be with high levels of silica explosive)