magnetic field: is related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dipole
Weight: 0.61
, coil
Weight: 0.59
, magnet
Weight: 0.58
, football field
Weight: 0.37
, baseball field
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is related 1.00
be related 0.99
be related to science 0.82
related to pain work 0.77
affect other 0.76
be related to math 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(magnetic field, is related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(field, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(magnetic field, is related)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mechanism, related to pain work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(magnetic field, is related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(field, is related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mechanism, related to pain work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(field, be related to math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, related to pain work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field, is related)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(field, be related to math)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(magnet, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, is related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(field, be related to math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, is related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(mechanism, related to pain work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, is related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(magnet, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(magnet, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(magnetic field, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(magnetic field, is related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, is related)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mechanism, related to pain work)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(field, be related to math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(magnet, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, is related)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mechanism, related to pain work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(magnetic field, is related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(field, be related to math)