magnolia: is home expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.63
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.60
, plant
Weight: 0.59
, tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, oak tree
Weight: 0.37
, maple tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.36
, apple tree
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is home expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.88
has state home 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple tree, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(magnolia, is home expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(magnolia, has state home)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(magnolia, has state home)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(magnolia, has state home)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(magnolia, has state home)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(magnolia, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magnolia, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(magnolia, is expensive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(magnolia, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(magnolia, is home expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(magnolia, is home expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(magnolia, is home expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple tree, is expensive)