magpie: attack other birds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
, scavenger
Weight: 0.46
, creature
Weight: 0.36
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
attack other birds 1.00
attack birds 0.98
kill other birds 0.91
kill birds 0.89
eat other birds 0.89
eat birds 0.87
attack foxes 0.86
attack owls 0.86
attack other magpies 0.86
attack pigeons 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bird, attack birds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bird, eat birds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(magpie, attack other birds)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bird, eat birds)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bird, attack birds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, attack birds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bird, eat birds)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(seagull, eat other birds)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(seagull, eat birds)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(bird, attack birds)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(bird, eat birds)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(seagull, eat birds)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(seagull, eat birds)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(seagull, eat other birds)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(seagull, eat other birds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(magpie, attack other birds)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(magpie, kill other birds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(magpie, attack birds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack birds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(magpie, kill birds)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(magpie, kill other birds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack birds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(magpie, kill other birds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(magpie, kill birds)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(magpie, kill birds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(magpie, attack birds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat other birds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(magpie, eat birds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(magpie, eat other birds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(magpie, eat other birds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(magpie, eat birds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(magpie, eat birds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(magpie, kill birds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(magpie, kill other birds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(magpie, eat birds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(magpie, eat other birds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other magpies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(magpie, attack other magpies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(magpie, attack other magpies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(magpie, attack other magpies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(magpie, attack other birds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bird, attack birds)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bird, eat birds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seagull, eat birds)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(seagull, eat other birds)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bird, attack birds)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(magpie, attack other birds)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bird, eat birds)