magpie: tap on windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.69
, animal
Weight: 0.50
, species
Weight: 0.48
, scavenger
Weight: 0.46
, creature
Weight: 0.36
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, wren
Weight: 0.37
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.37
, heron
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
tap on windows 1.00
knock on windows 0.82
peck at windows 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(seagull, peck at windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(seagull, peck at windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(seagull, peck at windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(magpie, tap on windows)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(magpie, knock on windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(magpie, knock on windows)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(magpie, knock on windows)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(magpie, knock on windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(magpie, tap on windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(magpie, tap on windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(magpie, tap on windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(seagull, peck at windows)