maid: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.67
, mother
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, servant
Weight: 0.61
, job
Weight: 0.59
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.37
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, waitress
Weight: 0.36
, grandmother
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is consistently bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waitress, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(waitress, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(waitress, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(maid, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(maid, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(maid, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(maid, is consistently bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(maid, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(maid, is consistently bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(maid, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maid, is consistently bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(maid, is consistently bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maid, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(maid, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(waitress, has quality good)