maine: have red dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.67
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, state
Weight: 0.57
Siblings vermont
Weight: 0.36
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.35
, las vegas
Weight: 0.34
, maryland
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red dogs 1.00
have red hot dogs 0.95
have dogs 0.92
have hot dogs 0.91
have state cat 0.81
has color red 0.78
is red state 0.77
have moose as state animal 0.77
has color yellow 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have red dogs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have red dogs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new hampshire, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have red dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has color yellow)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(vermont, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(vermont, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, has color yellow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(maine, have red dogs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(maine, have red dogs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new hampshire, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(maine, have red dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(las vegas, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(las vegas, has color yellow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(vermont, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(vermont, has color red)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(vermont, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vermont, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(maine, have red dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(maine, have dogs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(maine, have state cat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(maine, have state cat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(maine, have state cat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(maine, have dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(maine, have red hot dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(maine, have state cat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have hot dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(maine, have moose as state animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(maine, have moose as state animal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(maine, have moose as state animal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(maine, have moose as state animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(maine, have dogs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red hot dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(maine, have red hot dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(maine, have hot dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, has color yellow)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(maine, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(maine, have red hot dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(maine, has color yellow)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(maine, have hot dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maine, is red state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(maine, has color yellow)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(maine, is red state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(maine, has color yellow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(maine, have hot dogs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(maine, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(maine, have dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maine, have red dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color yellow)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(las vegas, has color yellow)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(vermont, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vermont, has color yellow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color yellow)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(maine, have red dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)