maintenance: be important for safety

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for safety 1.00
be important in sdlc 0.77
is safe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(edging, is safe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(edging, is safe)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(edging, is safe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(maintenance, be important for safety)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in sdlc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important for safety)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important for safety)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important for safety)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(edging, is safe)