maintenance: be important in engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in engineering 1.00
be important in science 0.80
be important to science 0.79
be important in research 0.76
be important in work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(variable, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(variable, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important to science)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in research)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(variable, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(variable, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(maintenance, be important in engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in science)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important to science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(maintenance, be important in engineering)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)