maintenance: be important in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in workplace 1.00
be in workplace 0.97
be important in social work 0.79
be important in work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(service, be important in social work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(service, be important in social work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, be important in social work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, be in workplace)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(service, be important in social work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cleaning, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cleaning, be in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(maintenance, be important in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(service, be important in social work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cleaning, be in workplace)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(maintenance, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(service, be important in social work)