maintenance: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, need
Weight: 0.60
Siblings cleaning
Weight: 0.58
, lubrication
Weight: 0.57
, watering
Weight: 0.53
, refill
Weight: 0.40
, edging
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
is hard 0.82
hard 0.80
tend harder 0.77
be hard for people 0.77
be important in sdlc 0.76
is more important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, tend harder)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(maintenance, is difficult)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(need, is more important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(maintenance, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(need, is more important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, tend harder)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(service, tend harder)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(need, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, be hard for people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, tend harder)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(need, is more important)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cleaning, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cleaning, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cleaning, hard)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cleaning, hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cleaning, be hard for people)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cleaning, be hard for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(maintenance, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(maintenance, be important in sdlc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, be important in sdlc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(maintenance, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(need, is more important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, tend harder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cleaning, hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cleaning, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cleaning, be hard for people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(need, is more important)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(maintenance, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, tend harder)