malaysia: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hong kong
Weight: 0.62
, indonesia
Weight: 0.60
, singapore
Weight: 0.59
, nation
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.57
Siblings sabah
Weight: 0.36
, usa
Weight: 0.34
, nigeria
Weight: 0.34
, taiwan
Weight: 0.34
, sweden
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is developed country 0.91
is developing 0.84
be considered developing country 0.78
is developing country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(singapore, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(indonesia, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(indonesia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(singapore, is developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(indonesia, is developing country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(indonesia, be considered developing country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hong kong, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, is developing country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(indonesia, be considered developing country)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singapore, is developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hong kong, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(usa, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(usa, is developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(taiwan, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(taiwan, is developing country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(singapore, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hong kong, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(indonesia, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(indonesia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sweden, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(taiwan, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(taiwan, is developed country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(usa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(usa, is developed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sweden, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(usa, is developed country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(usa, is developed country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(taiwan, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(taiwan, is developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(malaysia, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developed country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(malaysia, is developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, be considered developing country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(malaysia, be considered developing country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(malaysia, is developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(malaysia, be considered developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(malaysia, is developing country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(malaysia, be considered developing country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(malaysia, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singapore, is developed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(indonesia, is developing country)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(indonesia, be considered developing country)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hong kong, is developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(taiwan, is developed country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sweden, is developed country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweden, is developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(usa, is developed country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(usa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(taiwan, is developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(singapore, is developed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(indonesia, is developing country)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(indonesia, be considered developing country)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(malaysia, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hong kong, is developing country)