mall: be in areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in areas 1.00
be different from areas 0.91
be in then other areas 0.91
appear in areas 0.90
be in rural areas 0.89
be found in land in areas 0.89
stay than areas 0.88
be found in land in rural areas 0.87
be different from rural areas 0.87
protected areas 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, be different from rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in then other areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(area, be found in land in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(area, be found in land in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(area, be found in land in rural areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be in then other areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(area, be found in land in areas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, be different from rural areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(area, be found in land in rural areas)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(area, be different from rural areas)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(area, be found in land in areas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(area, be in then other areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in then other areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mall, be in areas)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(area, be found in land in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mall, be in areas)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, be different from rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mall, be in areas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(area, be found in land in rural areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(mall, be in areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(mall, be in areas)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in rural areas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mall, be in rural areas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mall, be in rural areas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(mall, be in rural areas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mall, be in areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(area, be in then other areas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(area, be found in land in areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(area, be found in land in rural areas)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(area, be different from rural areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(area, be in then other areas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(area, be found in land in areas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(area, be found in land in rural areas)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mall, be in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(area, be different from rural areas)