mammal: break down food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.78
, blue whale
Weight: 0.76
, sea otter
Weight: 0.76
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, dolphin
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
break down food 1.00
eat food 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(animal, eat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, break down food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(animal, eat food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(animal, eat food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mammal, break down food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mammal, break down food)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mammal, eat food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mammal, eat food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, break down food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, break down food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(mammal, break down food) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, eat food)