mammal: hairstyle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.78
, blue whale
Weight: 0.76
, sea otter
Weight: 0.76
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, dolphin
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
hairstyle 1.00
is hairstyle 1.00
has physical part hair 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part hair)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part hair)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sea otter, has physical part hair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mammal, hairstyle)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mammal, is hairstyle)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is hairstyle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mammal, is hairstyle)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(mammal, is hairstyle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mammal, has physical part hair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mammal, hairstyle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, hairstyle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mammal, hairstyle)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sea otter, has physical part hair)