mammal: survive in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.78
, blue whale
Weight: 0.76
, sea otter
Weight: 0.76
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, dolphin
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
survive in desert 1.00
drink in desert 0.85
survive in ocean 0.84
survive extinction 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(whale, survive in ocean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, survive in ocean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(blue whale, survive in ocean)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(blue whale, survive in ocean)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(whale, survive in ocean)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(whale, survive in ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mammal, survive in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(mammal, drink in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mammal, drink in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mammal, drink in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mammal, drink in desert)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, survive in ocean)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mammal, survive in ocean)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in ocean)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mammal, survive in ocean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammal, survive in desert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(blue whale, survive in ocean)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mammal, survive in desert)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(whale, survive in ocean)