mammoth: be at cold land

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cold land 1.00
get cold 0.84
be at cold climate 0.78
be defined as large live land animal 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(elephant, be defined as large live land animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(elephant, be defined as large live land animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(elephant, be defined as large live land animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at cold land)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at cold climate)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at cold climate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at cold climate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at cold climate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at cold land)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at cold land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at cold land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(elephant, be defined as large live land animal)