mammoth: be at freeze tundra

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, giant
Weight: 0.48
, thing
Weight: 0.45
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.33
, elephant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at freeze tundra 1.00
be at freeze siberian tundra 0.98
be at freeze arctic tundra 0.97
be at tundra 0.93
be at alaskan tundra 0.93
be at siberian tundra 0.90
be at freeze glacier 0.85
be at arctic 0.79
be at siberian permafrost 0.77
hibernate in burrow in cold weather 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at alaskan tundra)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at tundra)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mammoth, be at freeze siberian tundra)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mammoth, be at siberian tundra)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze siberian tundra)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(mammoth, be at freeze tundra)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(animal, hibernate in burrow in cold weather)