mammoth: have big feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, fossil
Weight: 0.49
, beast
Weight: 0.48
, giant
Weight: 0.48
Siblings giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, leviathan
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.34
, giant panda
Weight: 0.34
, sea lion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big feet 1.00
has physical part feet 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mammoth, have big feet)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mammoth, has physical part feet)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, has physical part feet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammoth, has physical part feet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(mammoth, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mammoth, have big feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(mammoth, have big feet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mammoth, have big feet)