man: be at love

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at love 1.00
love 0.99
desire that man love him 0.84
love to hold up baby 0.83
marry woman he love 0.82
desire to be beautiful 0.79
hate 0.79
has have passion to fly 0.79
desire that man kiss her 0.77
be used to have fun 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(woman, love to hold up baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(man, be at love)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(woman, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(man, be at love)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(woman, be used to have fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(man, be at love)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(woman, be at love)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(woman, be used to have fun)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(woman, love to hold up baby)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(woman, be at love)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(woman, be used to have fun)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(woman, love to hold up baby)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(woman, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(man, be at love)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(woman, love to hold up baby) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(man, be at love)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(woman, be used to have fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(man, be at love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(man, be at love)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(man, hate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(man, love)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(man, love)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(man, love)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(man, love)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(man, be at love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(woman, be at love)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(woman, love to hold up baby)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(woman, be used to have fun)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(woman, be at love)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(woman, love to hold up baby)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(man, be at love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(woman, be used to have fun)