man: be in tights

Related concepts

Parents	woman Weight: 0.70 , soldier Weight: 0.68 , politician Weight: 0.67
Siblings	old man Weight: 0.88 , young man Weight: 0.85 , young woman Weight: 0.81 , policeman Weight: 0.79 , nephew Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in tights	1.00
love tights	0.96
wear leggings in gym	0.84
wear socks with shorts	0.84
hate capri pants	0.83
wear pants	0.83
wear lomg pants	0.83
wear pants rather than kilts	0.83
wear long pants	0.82
wear panties	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(old man, wear pants)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(old man, wear pants) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(old man, wear pants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Salient(man, be in tights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Salient(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(man, be in tights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(man, be in tights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(man, be in tights) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(old man, wear pants)