management: be in garment industry

Related concepts

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be in garment industry	1.00
be used in industry	0.76
be made in industry	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(solution, be made in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(management, be in garment industry)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(solution, be used in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(management, be in garment industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(solution, be used in industry)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(solution, be made in industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(solution, be made in industry)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(solution, be used in industry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(solution, be made in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be in garment industry)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(solution, be used in industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be in garment industry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be in garment industry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be in garment industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(management, be in garment industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(solution, be used in industry)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(management, be in garment industry) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(solution, be made in industry)