management: get paid more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid more 1.00
get paid 0.96
is pay 0.86
be better than ethereum 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(management, get paid more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(variable, is pay)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(variable, is pay)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(neo, be better than ethereum)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(variable, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(management, get paid more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(neo, be better than ethereum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neo, be better than ethereum)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(management, get paid more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, get paid more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(management, get paid more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(variable, is pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(neo, be better than ethereum)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(management, get paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(variable, is pay)