management: has trait discipline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait discipline 1.00
be considered as discipline 0.90
has trait investment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(neo, has trait investment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(neo, has trait investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(neo, has trait investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(management, has trait discipline)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(management, be considered as discipline)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(management, be considered as discipline)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(management, be considered as discipline)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as discipline)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, has trait discipline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(management, has trait discipline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(management, has trait discipline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(neo, has trait investment)