management: is required

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is required 1.00
be required in organisation 0.99
is necessary 0.84
require certain amount 0.83
require amount 0.83
is needed 0.82
need keymaker 0.76
require certain amount of ram 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is required)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(variable, is needed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is required)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is required)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(industry, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(business activity, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(variable, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(variable, is needed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(business activity, is needed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(industry, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount of ram)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(operating system, require amount)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is needed)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(neo, need keymaker)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is required)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(storage, is necessary)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(storage, is needed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(industry, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, is required)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(variable, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, is required)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(business activity, is needed)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(management, is required)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(operating system, is required)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(operating system, is required)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(storage, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(storage, is necessary)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(storage, is needed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(storage, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(operating system, is needed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(operating system, is needed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(operating system, require certain amount)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(operating system, require amount)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(operating system, require amount)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(neo, need keymaker)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(neo, need keymaker)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(operating system, require certain amount of ram)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(operating system, require certain amount of ram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(management, is required)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(management, be required in organisation)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(management, be required in organisation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(management, be required in organisation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(management, is necessary)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is needed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(management, is necessary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(management, is needed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(management, be required in organisation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(management, is necessary)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(management, is needed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(management, is necessary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(management, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(management, is required)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(variable, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(operating system, is required)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(storage, is necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(storage, is needed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operating system, is needed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(neo, need keymaker)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(operating system, require certain amount)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(operating system, require amount)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(operating system, require certain amount of ram)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(industry, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(business activity, is needed)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(management, is required)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(variable, is needed)