management: keep employees unionizing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep employees unionizing 1.00
hate union 0.77
operate in union environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(neo, hate union)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(neo, hate union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neo, hate union)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(management, keep employees unionizing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(management, operate in union environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(management, operate in union environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(management, operate in union environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(management, operate in union environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, keep employees unionizing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(management, keep employees unionizing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(management, keep employees unionizing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(neo, hate union)