management: love workplace idiots

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.64
, solution
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.62
Siblings storage
Weight: 0.59
, neo
Weight: 0.38
, banking industry
Weight: 0.34
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
love workplace idiots 1.00
nazis hate 0.79
nazis people 0.76
nazis hurt people 0.76
hate union 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(neo, nazis hate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(neo, hate union)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(neo, nazis hurt people)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(neo, nazis people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(neo, nazis people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(neo, nazis people)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(neo, nazis hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(neo, nazis hate)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(neo, hate union) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(neo, hate union)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(neo, nazis hurt people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(neo, nazis hurt people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(management, love workplace idiots)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(management, love workplace idiots)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(neo, nazis people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(neo, nazis hate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(neo, hate union)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(management, love workplace idiots) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(neo, nazis hurt people)