manchester: be famous for sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous for sport 1.00
is famous 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(new hampshire, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be famous for sport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(melbourne, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(portsmouth, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(new hampshire, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(liverpool, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is famous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portsmouth, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(portsmouth, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(melbourne, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(melbourne, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(manchester, be famous for sport)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(manchester, is famous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(manchester, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(manchester, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manchester, be famous for sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(liverpool, is famous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(portsmouth, is famous)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(melbourne, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(manchester, be famous for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is famous)