manchester: is important regionally

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents club
Weight: 0.65
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.61
, new england
Weight: 0.61
, town
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings liverpool
Weight: 0.36
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, melbourne
Weight: 0.35
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is important regionally 1.00
is important nationally 0.83
is internationally 0.81
is important globally 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(leeds, is important nationally)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, is important globally)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(leeds, is important nationally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(leeds, is important nationally)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(liverpool, is important globally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(liverpool, is important globally)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(manchester, is important regionally)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(manchester, is important nationally)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(manchester, is important nationally)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manchester, is important globally)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manchester, is important globally)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(manchester, is important nationally)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(manchester, is important globally)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important nationally)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important globally)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(manchester, is important regionally)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(liverpool, is important globally)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(manchester, is important regionally) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(leeds, is important nationally)