mandarin: mean

Related concepts

Parents	chinese language Weight: 0.71 , language Weight: 0.63 , dialect Weight: 0.56 , villain Weight: 0.55 , note Weight: 0.54
Siblings	english language Weight: 0.35 , italian language Weight: 0.33 , old english Weight: 0.33 , lisp Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
mean	1.00
affect thinking	0.77
be like right-to-left	0.76
affect way	0.76
happen	0.76
be about god necessarily metaphorical	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(villain, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(mandarin, mean)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(dialect, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(mandarin, mean)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(language, affect thinking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(mandarin, mean)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(dialect, mean)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(villain, mean)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(language, affect thinking)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(language, affect thinking)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(villain, mean)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(dialect, mean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(lisp, mean)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(lisp, happen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(villain, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(mandarin, mean)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(dialect, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(mandarin, mean)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(language, affect thinking) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(mandarin, mean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(lisp, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(lisp, mean)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(lisp, happen) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(lisp, happen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(mandarin, mean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(mandarin, mean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(dialect, mean)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(villain, mean)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(language, affect thinking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(lisp, mean)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(lisp, happen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(dialect, mean)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(villain, mean)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(mandarin, mean) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(language, affect thinking)