mango: be hard in middle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.64
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings coconut
Weight: 0.39
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.38
, crab apple
Weight: 0.38
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.38
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard in middle 1.00
is hard 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pomegranate, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(coconut, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(coconut, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut, is hard)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pomegranate, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pomegranate, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(coconut milk, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(mango, be hard in middle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mango, be hard in middle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pomegranate, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(coconut, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mango, be hard in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(coconut milk, is hard)