manhattan: is populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.61
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, london
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is populated 1.00
is densely populated 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(manhattan, is populated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york, is densely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is densely populated)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(london, is densely populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(manhattan, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york city, is populated)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, is populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york city, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new york city, is densely populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(london, is densely populated)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(london, is densely populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(manhattan, is populated)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is densely populated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(manhattan, is densely populated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(manhattan, is densely populated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(manhattan, is densely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(manhattan, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new york, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new york city, is populated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(new york city, is densely populated)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(london, is densely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(manhattan, is populated)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new york, is densely populated)