manhattan: was called new amsterdam

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.61
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, london
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.35
, miami
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was called new amsterdam 1.00
was called amsterdam 0.97
be called new york 0.78
be called new york ny 0.77
be called manhattan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(new york, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(new york, was called new amsterdam)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was called new amsterdam)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called manhattan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(new york, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(new york city, be called manhattan)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called manhattan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(manhattan, was called amsterdam)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(manhattan, was called amsterdam)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(manhattan, was called amsterdam)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(manhattan, be called new york)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(manhattan, be called new york)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(manhattan, be called manhattan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(manhattan, be called new york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, be called new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(manhattan, be called manhattan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(manhattan, be called new york ny)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(manhattan, be called manhattan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(manhattan, be called new york ny)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manhattan, be called new york ny)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, be called new york ny)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called amsterdam)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, be called manhattan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(new york, was called new amsterdam)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(new york city, be called manhattan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(manhattan, was called new amsterdam)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(new york, was called new amsterdam)