manila: is overpopulated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents port
Weight: 0.62
, city
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.51
, town
Weight: 0.48
, philippines
Weight: 0.48
Siblings manila bay
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33
, mexico city
Weight: 0.32
, new york city
Weight: 0.32
, sacramento
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is overpopulated 1.00
is populated 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(city, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manila, is overpopulated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(city, is populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is overpopulated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is populated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(city, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(manila, is overpopulated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(mexico city, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is overpopulated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(new york city, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, is populated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mexico city, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(manila, is overpopulated)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(manila, is populated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(manila, is populated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(manila, is populated)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(manila, is populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(manila, is overpopulated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(city, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mexico city, is overpopulated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(new york city, is populated)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(mexico city, is populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(manila, is overpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(city, is populated)