manure: good for plant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fertilizer
Weight: 0.62
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.56
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, ammonia
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, dairy product
Weight: 0.34
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
good for plant 1.00
be good for plants 0.93
burn plants 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(manure, good for plant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fertilizer, burn plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(manure, good for plant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, burn plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, burn plants)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(compost, burn plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for plants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(manure, good for plant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(fertilizer, burn plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(manure, good for plant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(compost, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for plants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(compost, burn plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(compost, burn plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(manure, good for plant)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(manure, be good for plants)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, be good for plants)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(manure, be good for plants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(manure, burn plants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manure, be good for plants)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(manure, good for plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fertilizer, burn plants)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(compost, burn plants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(compost, be good for plants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for plants)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(manure, good for plant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fertilizer, burn plants)