many animals: has physical part tongues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongues 1.00
have pink tongues 0.89
has physical part tails 0.80
has physical part heart 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(many animals, has physical part tongues)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(many animals, have pink tongues)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(many animals, has physical part tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(many animals, has physical part heart)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(many animals, have pink tongues)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(many animals, has physical part heart)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(many animals, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(many animals, has physical part heart)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(many animals, has physical part heart)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(many animals, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(many animals, have pink tongues)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(many animals, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(many animals, have pink tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(many animals, has physical part tongues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(many animals, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(many animals, has physical part tongues)