map: be a part of atlas

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings atlas
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34
, document
Weight: 0.33
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of atlas 1.00
be at atlas 0.99
has map 0.82
has many map 0.80
be at map website 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(atlas, has map)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(atlas, has many map)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(atlas, has map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(atlas, has map)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(atlas, has many map) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(atlas, has many map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(map, be a part of atlas)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(map, be at atlas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(map, be at atlas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(map, be at atlas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(map, be at atlas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(map, be at map website)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(map, be a part of atlas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(atlas, has map)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(map, be a part of atlas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(atlas, has many map)