map: be at table

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings atlas
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34
, document
Weight: 0.33
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at table 1.00
sit on top of desk 0.78
be at accountant table 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be at accountant table)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(calculator, be at accountant table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(calculator, be at accountant table)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(calculator, sit on top of desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(calculator, sit on top of desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(map, be at table)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(map, be at table)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(map, be at table)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(calculator, sit on top of desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(map, be at table) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(calculator, be at accountant table)