map: be drawn to scale

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be drawn to scale 1.00
be to scale 0.89
be drawn 0.87
is drawn 0.87
need scale 0.87
show scale 0.85
be drawn at top 0.82
be drawn looking 0.81
be drawn with north 0.81
be drawn looking down 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(polygon, be drawn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(polygon, be drawn)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(polygon, be drawn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(map, be drawn to scale)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(map, be drawn)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(map, be drawn)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(map, be drawn)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(map, is drawn)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(map, is drawn)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(map, is drawn)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(map, be drawn)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(map, is drawn)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(map, be drawn to scale)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be drawn to scale)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(map, be drawn to scale)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(polygon, be drawn)