map: be important tools people use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important tools people use 1.00
be important tools use 0.98
be important tools have 0.96
is useful tools 0.93
has physical part tools 0.89
is practical tools 0.89
is useful tool 0.86
be useful tools studying 0.86
be called tool 0.84
has physical part tool 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(map, be important tools people use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(map, be important tools people use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(map, be important tools people use)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(map, be important tools use)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(map, is useful tools)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(map, be important tools have)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(map, be important tools have)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(map, be important tools use)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(map, be important tools use)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(map, be important tools use)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(map, be important tools have)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(map, is useful tools)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(map, be important tools have)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(map, is useful tools)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(map, is useful tools)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(map, be useful tools studying)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(map, be useful tools studying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(map, be useful tools studying)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(map, be useful tools studying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(map, be important tools people use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(map, be important tools people use)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)