map: be more useful than globe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more useful than globe 1.00
be more helpful than globe 0.98
be less accurate than globe 0.93
be similar to globe 0.90
be preferred over globe 0.88
be preferred to globe 0.87
has shape globe 0.87
be more useful than globes 0.79
be useful to people 0.77
be more useful than globes studying 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(artifact, be useful to people)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(artifact, be useful to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be useful to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(artifact, be useful to people)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(map, be more useful than globe)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(map, be less accurate than globe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(map, has shape globe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(map, be more helpful than globe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(map, has shape globe)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(map, be similar to globe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(map, be less accurate than globe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(map, has shape globe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(map, has shape globe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(map, be similar to globe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(map, be less accurate than globe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(map, be less accurate than globe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(map, be preferred over globe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(map, be similar to globe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be preferred to globe)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, be similar to globe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(map, be more useful than globes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(map, be more useful than globes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(map, be more helpful than globe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(map, be more helpful than globe)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(map, be more helpful than globe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(map, be preferred to globe)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, be preferred to globe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(map, be preferred to globe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globes studying)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(map, be preferred over globe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(map, be preferred over globe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(map, be preferred over globe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, be more useful than globe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(artifact, be useful to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(map, be more useful than globe)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(artifact, be useful to people)