map: be used to represent geographical feature

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings atlas
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34
, document
Weight: 0.33
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to represent geographical feature 1.00
be used to represent feature 0.88
be used to represent build 0.80
be used to represent road 0.79
be used to represent street 0.79
be used to represent mountain 0.77
be used to represent structure of earth 0.77
distort part of what it represent 0.76
be used to represent river 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent feature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent feature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent road)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent river)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent street)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent mountain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent feature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent river)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent structure of earth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent road)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent mountain)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent structure of earth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(map, be used to represent river)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent build)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent street)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent mountain)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(map, be used to represent structure of earth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent street)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent road)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent feature)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent road)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent street)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent structure of earth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent mountain)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(map, distort part of what it represent)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to represent geographical feature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(map, be used to represent geographical feature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(map, be used to represent geographical feature)