map: had distort shapes of continents

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.50
, classifier
Weight: 0.48
, mercator projection
Weight: 0.46
, tau
Weight: 0.41
, seine
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
had distort shapes of continents 1.00
had distort shapes 0.92
distort shapes 0.89
distort shapes of landmasses 0.86
had distort oceans 0.86
have distort 0.84
distort earth 0.83
distort 0.82
distort distance 0.82
distort reality 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(map, had distort shapes of continents)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(map, distort shapes of landmasses)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(map, distort earth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(map, distort shapes of landmasses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(map, distort shapes of landmasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(map, distort earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(map, distort earth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(map, distort shapes of landmasses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(map, distort earth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(map, distort)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(map, distort)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(map, distort)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(map, distort)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(map, had distort shapes of continents)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(map, had distort shapes of continents)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(map, had distort shapes of continents)