map: has information

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.65
, guide
Weight: 0.64
, artifact
Weight: 0.62
, publication
Weight: 0.61
Siblings atlas
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.34
, document
Weight: 0.33
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has information 1.00
be used to information 0.96
be one form of information 0.87
be used to store information 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(document, has information)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(document, be used to store information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(document, has information)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(document, has information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(document, be used to store information)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(document, be used to store information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(map, has information)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(map, be used to information)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(map, be used to information)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(map, be one form of information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(map, be used to information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(map, be one form of information)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, be used to information)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(map, be one form of information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(map, be one form of information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, has information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(map, has information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(document, has information)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(map, has information)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(document, be used to store information)