maple syrup: be better than honey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents syrup
Weight: 0.79
, herb
Weight: 0.73
, maple
Weight: 0.71
, chocolate
Weight: 0.71
, fruit
Weight: 0.67
Siblings licorice
Weight: 0.38
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.37
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.37
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.37
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than honey 1.00
be better than sugar 0.85
be better than white sugar 0.83
be healthier than sugar 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fruit, be better than sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fruit, be better than sugar)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be better than sugar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(fruit, be better than sugar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(maple syrup, be better than honey)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be healthier than sugar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than sugar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be better than sugar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(maple syrup, be healthier than sugar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(maple syrup, be better than sugar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be better than sugar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than white sugar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be healthier than sugar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be healthier than sugar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be better than white sugar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(maple syrup, be better than white sugar)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(maple syrup, be better than white sugar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than sugar)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(maple syrup, be better than honey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fruit, be better than sugar)